<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a Simplified Graham Value Stock Screener</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener</link>
	<description>Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Value Investing Four Filters &#124; BuyingValue.com</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Value Investing Four Filters &#124; BuyingValue.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Filter 2 Graham Fundamentals: Once a company has cleared filter 1 we apply filter 2. Filter two&#8217;s role is to get past the optimism insiders have shown in filter one and ask if the company has a healthy future and is priced inexpensively. To anyone familiar with Benjamin Graham the rules used in this filter are old hat, for a sample have a look at my previous posts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Filter 2 Graham Fundamentals: Once a company has cleared filter 1 we apply filter 2. Filter two&#8217;s role is to get past the optimism insiders have shown in filter one and ask if the company has a healthy future and is priced inexpensively. To anyone familiar with Benjamin Graham the rules used in this filter are old hat, for a sample have a look at my previous posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: value investor</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, thanks for the note. The google screener is based off of moving market numbers some days no companies show up at all, other days there are a bunch of companies to choose from. Keep checking back in! Thanks for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, thanks for the note. The google screener is based off of moving market numbers some days no companies show up at all, other days there are a bunch of companies to choose from. Keep checking back in! Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric J. Fox</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric J. Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>No companies found when i ran the screen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No companies found when i ran the screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: value investor</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the catch, I had it correct in the link but missed it in the text. Corrected now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the catch, I had it correct in the link but missed it in the text. Corrected now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I think you have the criteria for P/B and Current Ratio backwards.  Shouldn&#039;t it be &quot;less than or equal to&quot; for P/B, and &quot;greater than or equal to&quot; for Current Ratio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have the criteria for P/B and Current Ratio backwards.  Shouldn&#8217;t it be &#8220;less than or equal to&#8221; for P/B, and &#8220;greater than or equal to&#8221; for Current Ratio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Bloch</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Bloch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/building-a-simplified-graham-value-stock-screener/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&quot;Remember showing up on the scanner does not indicate you should buy, it means you should look at it :)&quot; Spot on. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is great by the way. Thanks for sharing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Ethan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remember showing up on the scanner does not indicate you should buy, it means you should look at it <img src='http://buyingvalue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221; Spot on. </p>
<p>This is great by the way. Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<p>Ethan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 493/530 objects using disk: basic

Served from: buyingvalue.com @ 2012-05-18 03:51:54 -->
