Comments on: Graham vs. Greenblatt (Session 3) Return on Capital http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/graham-vs-greenblatt-session-3-return-on-capital/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=graham-vs-greenblatt-session-3-return-on-capital Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:59:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anonymous http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/graham-vs-greenblatt-session-3-return-on-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-28 Anonymous Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:34:00 +0000 http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/graham-vs-greenblatt-session-3-return-on-capital/#comment-28 The denominator of the formula is "Net Working Capital + Net Fixed Assets", not "Net Worth Capital...". Big difference. <br/>Otherwise, great post. The denominator of the formula is “Net Working Capital + Net Fixed Assets”, not “Net Worth Capital…”. Big difference.
Otherwise, great post.

]]> By: Anonymous http://buyingvalue.com/2008/12/graham-vs-greenblatt-session-3-return-on-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Anonymous Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:34:00 +0000 http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/graham-vs-greenblatt-session-3-return-on-capital/#comment-29 The denominator of the formula is "Net Working Capital + Net Fixed Assets", not "Net Worth Capital...". Big difference. <br/>Otherwise, great post. The denominator of the formula is “Net Working Capital + Net Fixed Assets”, not “Net Worth Capital…”. Big difference.
Otherwise, great post.

]]>