<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value Investing Four Filters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=value-investing-four-filters</link>
	<description>Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: value investor</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=84#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim. I have some more details in this post:

http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/

See if that is what you are looking for. Love to hear about your filters, do tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim. I have some more details in this post:</p>
<p><a href="http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/" rel="nofollow">http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/</a></p>
<p>See if that is what you are looking for. Love to hear about your filters, do tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=84#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information. I just had a quick question. You mention what you filter for but you don&#039;t elaborate on the metrics you use for the actual filter. I&#039;d be very curious to know how you do that. I have my own ideas but would like to see yours. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information. I just had a quick question. You mention what you filter for but you don&#8217;t elaborate on the metrics you use for the actual filter. I&#8217;d be very curious to know how you do that. I have my own ideas but would like to see yours. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: value investor</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=84#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I read up on all three of these and started writing a review of all three, it won&#039;t fit in this little reply so I may post my formal review. Summary notes though here:

BAX  - I don&#039;t love the PE of 16 when the sector is 4, not a super exciting dividend yield 2%, high revenue to employee, but I do like the 5yr EPS growth rate 14.
Not a ton of insider action: http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&amp;tickerLookUp=BAX&amp;Submit2322=GO

GR    - Love the P/E of 8, Love the current ratio 2, love the 5 yr EPS 75, boring dividend.
Mostly sells around this price on the insider front: http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&amp;tickerLookUp=GR&amp;Submit232=GO

GWW- Love the 5yr EPS growth 19.7, Love the Revenue/Employee 406,490, boring dividend.
Lots of sells below the current level: http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&amp;tickerLookUp=GWW&amp;Submit232=GO


If I was going to put my dollars into one bucket it would be PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read up on all three of these and started writing a review of all three, it won&#8217;t fit in this little reply so I may post my formal review. Summary notes though here:</p>
<p>BAX  &#8211; I don&#8217;t love the PE of 16 when the sector is 4, not a super exciting dividend yield 2%, high revenue to employee, but I do like the 5yr EPS growth rate 14.<br />
Not a ton of insider action: <a href="http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&#038;tickerLookUp=BAX&#038;Submit2322=GO" rel="nofollow">http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&#038;tickerLookUp=BAX&#038;Submit2322=GO</a></p>
<p>GR    &#8211; Love the P/E of 8, Love the current ratio 2, love the 5 yr EPS 75, boring dividend.<br />
Mostly sells around this price on the insider front: <a href="http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&#038;tickerLookUp=GR&#038;Submit232=GO" rel="nofollow">http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&#038;tickerLookUp=GR&#038;Submit232=GO</a></p>
<p>GWW- Love the 5yr EPS growth 19.7, Love the Revenue/Employee 406,490, boring dividend.<br />
Lots of sells below the current level: <a href="http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&#038;tickerLookUp=GWW&#038;Submit232=GO" rel="nofollow">http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/Generate.php?DV=yes&#038;tickerLookUp=GWW&#038;Submit232=GO</a></p>
<p>If I was going to put my dollars into one bucket it would be PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Links: April 19, 2009 &#124; Dividends Value</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Links: April 19, 2009 &#124; Dividends Value</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=84#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] Buy Value presented Value Investing Four Filters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Buy Value presented Value Investing Four Filters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Dividend Investing Roundup - April 18, 2009 &#124; The Dividend Guy Blog</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Dividend Investing Roundup - April 18, 2009 &#124; The Dividend Guy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=84#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] Value investing four filters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Value investing four filters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider Trades: 04/17/2009 &#124; BuyingValue.com</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider Trades: 04/17/2009 &#124; BuyingValue.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=84#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] are companies that have been selected by my filter application. Read more about our value filters here. These companies are those that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are companies that have been selected by my filter application. Read more about our value filters here. These companies are those that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts?</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/value-investing-four-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=84#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to hear what you think of the following;

BAX (Baxter), GR (Goodrich), GWW (Grainger)

Here is what I see;

1. Very Good D/E
2. Very Good CR
3. Good Dividends
4. Good 5 year EPS
*Thus sound financially
5. All trading at a discount with respect to Intrinsic Value
**Value Stocks
6. Better than their Peers in the sector for ROE, 5 yr ROE, Profit Margin, and 5 yr Profit Margin
***Leaders in their sector.

So in short, sound financially, good values, and better than their peers historically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to hear what you think of the following;</p>
<p>BAX (Baxter), GR (Goodrich), GWW (Grainger)</p>
<p>Here is what I see;</p>
<p>1. Very Good D/E<br />
2. Very Good CR<br />
3. Good Dividends<br />
4. Good 5 year EPS<br />
*Thus sound financially<br />
5. All trading at a discount with respect to Intrinsic Value<br />
**Value Stocks<br />
6. Better than their Peers in the sector for ROE, 5 yr ROE, Profit Margin, and 5 yr Profit Margin<br />
***Leaders in their sector.</p>
<p>So in short, sound financially, good values, and better than their peers historically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 522/547 objects using disk: basic

Served from: buyingvalue.com @ 2012-05-18 04:36:47 -->
