<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proximity and Profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/proximity-profits-portfolio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/proximity-profits-portfolio/</link>
	<description>Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:51:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Ryan</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/proximity-profits-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=649#comment-387</guid>
		<description>What you wrote makes even more sense given the ultra-low commission rates nowadays. Before discount brokers came along, mutual funds&#039; diversification rationale was more compelling for the following reason: the commission costs on a well-diversified portfolio for an individual account were killers. If each transaction took out 1% in commissions - not unrealistic back in the olden days for a small-to-medium purchase - then buying 20 stocks would incur a 20% transaction charge, not including any odd-lot surcharges. It costs far less to diversify on your own nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you wrote makes even more sense given the ultra-low commission rates nowadays. Before discount brokers came along, mutual funds&#8217; diversification rationale was more compelling for the following reason: the commission costs on a well-diversified portfolio for an individual account were killers. If each transaction took out 1% in commissions &#8211; not unrealistic back in the olden days for a small-to-medium purchase &#8211; then buying 20 stocks would incur a 20% transaction charge, not including any odd-lot surcharges. It costs far less to diversify on your own nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
