Comments on: Best Insider Traders http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=insider-traders Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:59:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Insider Trades: 3/22/2010 | BuyingValue.com http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/comment-page-1/#comment-4544 Insider Trades: 3/22/2010 | BuyingValue.com Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:38:59 +0000 http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1079#comment-4544 [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...] [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...]

]]> By: Insider Trades: 08/10/2009 | BuyingValue.com http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/comment-page-1/#comment-1360 Insider Trades: 08/10/2009 | BuyingValue.com Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:35:46 +0000 http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1079#comment-1360 [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...] [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...]

]]> By: Insider Trades: 28/09/2009 | BuyingValue.com http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/comment-page-1/#comment-1234 Insider Trades: 28/09/2009 | BuyingValue.com Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:31:58 +0000 http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1079#comment-1234 [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...] [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...]

]]> By: Insider Trades: 26/08/2009 | BuyingValue.com http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/comment-page-1/#comment-959 Insider Trades: 26/08/2009 | BuyingValue.com Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:59:38 +0000 http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1079#comment-959 [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...] [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...]

]]> By: Insider Trades: 15/08/2009 | BuyingValue.com http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/comment-page-1/#comment-750 Insider Trades: 15/08/2009 | BuyingValue.com Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:56:04 +0000 http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1079#comment-750 [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...] [...] that have cleared the first filter in the last 7 days and are the highest ranked filter 2. See here for more about the current selection [...]

]]> By: value investor http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/comment-page-1/#comment-732 value investor Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:44:22 +0000 http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1079#comment-732 Hi, Initially I did think about adding the mean and median returns to my metrics. As you pointed out this would enable the ability to see if the portfolio would have risen consistently as compared to an index or if it had fluctuated all over the place. Did a role have one great quarter and the rest were low? After thinking about this some more though I concluded that it didn't really matter to me, by having the best min and the best max we avoid the potential of loosing money and increase the potential of making money. Let me give an example: if one stock trades at a 0% increase from purchase price for 4 quarters and then suddenly goes to 100% of purchase price to me that is equal to a stock steadily increasing from 0 - 100% over the same period. As long as the stock doesn't dip below 0%. But hey what do you think? Happy to provide the mean and median- let me know if you think I am completely wrong. Hi,
Initially I did think about adding the mean and median returns to my metrics. As you pointed out this would enable the ability to see if the portfolio would have risen consistently as compared to an index or if it had fluctuated all over the place. Did a role have one great quarter and the rest were low? After thinking about this some more though I concluded that it didn’t really matter to me, by having the best min and the best max we avoid the potential of loosing money and increase the potential of making money. Let me give an example: if one stock trades at a 0% increase from purchase price for 4 quarters and then suddenly goes to 100% of purchase price to me that is equal to a stock steadily increasing from 0 – 100% over the same period. As long as the stock doesn’t dip below 0%.
But hey what do you think? Happy to provide the mean and median- let me know if you think I am completely wrong.

]]> By: edpin http://buyingvalue.com/2009/08/insider-traders/comment-page-1/#comment-658 edpin Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:06:40 +0000 http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1079#comment-658 Great information. Thanks for that. What's their mean and median returns? Max and min are not very informative. If the mean and median returns are below market, how good is following their lead? Cheers. EP Great information. Thanks for that.

What’s their mean and median returns? Max and min are not very informative. If the mean and median returns are below market, how good is following their lead?

Cheers.

EP

]]>