<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking Advantage of a Day Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buyingvalue.com/2010/01/day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2010/01/day/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=day</link>
	<description>Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: value investor</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2010/01/day/comment-page-1/#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1464#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>Up 1.55% now- however it was down $9 early on. I&#039;m sure you read the whole sentence though and could see I wasn&#039;t recommending a buy or sell on GOOG.

To your point I would argue there is a difference between timing trades and pricing stock. If I think Google is worth say $400 I would be foolish to hold a liquid assets in a pending trade waiting for that price to arrive. However if the news had been all bad on the day off it might have been a smart move. That would be pricing, not timing no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up 1.55% now- however it was down $9 early on. I&#8217;m sure you read the whole sentence though and could see I wasn&#8217;t recommending a buy or sell on GOOG.</p>
<p>To your point I would argue there is a difference between timing trades and pricing stock. If I think Google is worth say $400 I would be foolish to hold a liquid assets in a pending trade waiting for that price to arrive. However if the news had been all bad on the day off it might have been a smart move. That would be pricing, not timing no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2010/01/day/comment-page-1/#comment-2988</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=1464#comment-2988</guid>
		<description>&quot;looking for some weakness, or maybe if you think the market will overreact to Google leaving China&quot;

Wow you nailed that one...  up over 1% today!

You should know by now, don&#039;t time the market.  Look for value and buy it when you find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;looking for some weakness, or maybe if you think the market will overreact to Google leaving China&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow you nailed that one&#8230;  up over 1% today!</p>
<p>You should know by now, don&#8217;t time the market.  Look for value and buy it when you find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 429/466 objects using disk: basic

Served from: buyingvalue.com @ 2012-02-08 16:18:39 -->
