<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BuyingValue.com &#187; Stock Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buyingvalue.com/category/stock-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buyingvalue.com</link>
	<description>Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 23:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie Mae?</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/fannie-mae/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fannie-mae</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/fannie-mae/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bargain Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fnm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Competitive Advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benjamin Graham often wrote of distinguishing the difference between investing and speculating. Fannie Mae, in its current state, sits in the speculating bucket. Investing has to fun though, sometimes it is interesting to window shop, so lets look. Evaluation based on Buffet&#8217;s Criteria When looking at a business I often ask myself what other investors [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/fannie-mae/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bristol-Myers</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/05/bristolmyers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bristolmyers</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/05/bristolmyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 06:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avista Capital Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Myers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Myers Squibb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Myers Squibb Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kosan Biosciences Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mead Johnson Nutritionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myers Squibb Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article originally appeared on The DIV-Net May 15 2009. This week we are reviewing Bristol-Myers Squibb as a possible stock acquisition. To do so we will use the Buffett four filters we discussed in a previous article. About the Company Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is engaged in the discovery, development, licensing, manufacturing, marketing, distribution [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/05/bristolmyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Ford Up To?</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/ford-stock/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ford-stock</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/ford-stock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over Christmas I analyzed Ford&#8217;s financial statements from the previous years and decided that the current $1.60 / share it was trading at was under its intrinsic value. A stock price I had anticipated some time earlier see the post. I invested and set a target sell price of $4.50-5.50. The stock has risen impressively [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/04/ford-stock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Greed Interferes: Puget Power (PSD)</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/02/when-greed-interferes-puget-power-psd/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=when-greed-interferes-puget-power-psd</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/02/when-greed-interferes-puget-power-psd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investor Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparable Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February 7th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrinsic Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mistake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puget Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road To Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wise Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/when-greed-interferes-puget-power-psd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday February 7th Puget Power announced the closing of the sale of its core business at $30 per share. Regular readers of my blog will recall that I recommended a purchase of PSD in November of last year at $18. If one includes the $.25 dividend payment from Jan 16th, and the pro rata [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/02/when-greed-interferes-puget-power-psd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vancouver Olympics and Fortress Investment Group</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/01/vancouver-olympics-and-fortress-investment-group/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vancouver-olympics-and-fortress-investment-group</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/01/vancouver-olympics-and-fortress-investment-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Winter Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Of Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortress Investment Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vancouver-olympics-and-fortress-investment-group/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vancouver is currently preparing for the 2010 Winter Olympics. As part of the Olympics Vancouver is constructing a residences for athletes. The city had planned to see the residence sold off as condos after the Olympics for a healthy profit. With the credit crunch and the downturn in housing in Vancouver though the story is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/01/vancouver-olympics-and-fortress-investment-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Analysis Methanex</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/01/stock-analysis-methanex/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stock-analysis-methanex</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/01/stock-analysis-methanex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eps Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Return On Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Return On Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tsx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/stock-analysis-methanex/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally published on: Div-Net After much searching I found a stock screener for Canadian stocks (more on this in another post). I was able to assemble a Graham style screener with the following criteria: Exchange TSX P/E less than 15 Dividend Yield &#62; 3.5 Average EPS &#62; 33% Revenue &#62; $550M Current Ratio &#62; 2 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/01/stock-analysis-methanex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis of TIN &#8211; Temple-Inland</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/11/tin-temple-inland/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tin-temple-inland</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/11/tin-temple-inland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temple Inland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/tin-temple-inland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I paid for it: Still looking thanks! What I like about it: I love to see recent insider buying. People sell stock for all sorts of reasons, but only buy stock for one reason: Low, low, low P/E 0.42, industry at 7.42 (did I read that right&#8230; yup ya did). Price to book 0.61, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/11/tin-temple-inland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Analysis PSD- Puget Power</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/11/psd-puget-power/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=psd-puget-power</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/11/psd-puget-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrinsic Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puget Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tobylang.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/psd-puget-power/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I paid for it $18.00 What I like about it: Fair insulation from credit problems, and recession. Good dividend yield at 4.1% (distribution Dec 1). Company due to be purchased at $30 pending one final approval (this is the big one). What I don&#8217;t like about it: P/E higher than industry, sector, and S&#38;P. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2008/11/psd-puget-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1075/1256 objects using disk: basic

Served from: buyingvalue.com @ 2012-02-09 11:38:48 -->
