<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BuyingValue.com &#187; Moat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buyingvalue.com/tag/moat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buyingvalue.com</link>
	<description>Price is What you Pay Value is What you Get</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 23:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie Mae?</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/fannie-mae/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fannie-mae</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/fannie-mae/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bargain Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fnm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Competitive Advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benjamin Graham often wrote of distinguishing the difference between investing and speculating. Fannie Mae, in its current state, sits in the speculating bucket. Investing has to fun though, sometimes it is interesting to window shop, so lets look. Evaluation based on Buffet&#8217;s Criteria When looking at a business I often ask myself what other investors [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/fannie-mae/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boring Companies Part 2</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/boring-companies-part-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=boring-companies-part-2</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/boring-companies-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boring Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branded Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clothing Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core Competencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harley Davidson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housewares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inefficiencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Material Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorbikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staple Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twenty Years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the previous article we started a discussion on boring companies. I argued that the reason so many elite investors like boring companies is due to the consistent and sustained profits these businesses often have. I then went on to detail how boring companies have deep moats that keep competition at bay, produce limited time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/boring-companies-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boring Companies Part 1</title>
		<link>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/boring-companies-part-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=boring-companies-part-1</link>
		<comments>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/boring-companies-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>value investor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boring Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Term Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value Investors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buyingvalue.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both value and  long term investors talk about how much they like boring businesses. We like these businesses so much because, if run correctly, they are able to reliably generate a consistent source of long term revenue. Consistency and reliability are the key terms here as these businesses can be trusted to year in and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buyingvalue.com/2009/07/boring-companies-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 642/739 objects using disk: basic

Served from: buyingvalue.com @ 2012-02-08 15:21:35 -->
